EDL supporters demonstrate outside Blackburn’s ‘Halal’ KFC

Just days after the Mail on Sunday’s campaign – which I blogged about here – to incite mischief over the sale of ‘halal’ meat in an increasing number of mainstream outlets, supporters of the English Defence League have now begun to hold daily demonstrations outside a Kentucky Fried Chicken branch in Blackburn which has decided to obtain its chicken from ‘halal’ sources.

According to a local newspaper report:

‘[the] demonstrations kicked off with scenes of disorder as 50 English Defence League protestors descended on the Haslingden Road restaurant.

‘Four men were arrested on suspected public order offences late on Sunday and a skip was set on fire.’

EDL supporters have been involved in a number of anti-Muslim incidents in the past eighteen months including rampaging through a predominantly Muslim area of Luton smashing up shop windows and assaulting individuals with an Asian appearance. So, it is not particularly surprising that they would get worked up by the sight of a ‘halal KFC’ branch. But what I found most astonishing was the following reason an EDL supporter gave for holding their demonstrations:

‘There are quite a few issues which concern us, such as the welfare of the animals that are slaughtered.’

It is certainly right to be concerned about the welfare of animals especially those that are meant to be slaughtered. All too often they are kept and then transported in appalling and cruel conditions. However, as this report from The Independent a couple of years ago reveals, such cruel treatment is by no means unique to ‘halal’ butchers.

An added bit of irony to this story is that although the KFC branch in Blackburn has decided to market itself as a ‘halal outlet’, a spokesperson from the Lancashire Council of Mosques is quoted as rejecting their claim because the KFC chicken is stunned prior to slaughter.

This reflects a wider point about what actually constitutes ‘halal meat’. ‘Halal meat’ is a very profitable business to be in, particularly if you have set yourself up as an arbiter of what is halal and what is not. There are a number of Halal ‘authorities’ which give their seal of approval to outlets like KFC and are handsomely remunerated in return.

Some of these Halal ‘authorities’ disagree with each other about whether animals are allowed to be stunned prior to slaughter or not. The Halal Food Authority – which KFC works with – are prepared to certify those chickens that have been stunned prior to slaughter as halal while the Halal Monitoring Committee – a rival ‘authority’ – does not.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Islam and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to EDL supporters demonstrate outside Blackburn’s ‘Halal’ KFC

  1. Usman says:

    Regarding animal welfare and halal slaughter, I only know of one comparative study into animal pain levels. Its results will surprise most people (and disapoint the EDL). I have capitalised selected words for emphasis:

    “In summary the following conclusions are possible:
    1. Slaughter after CAPTIVE BOLT STUNNING
    A. Calves
    Most severe general disturbances (waves of 1-2 Hz) occurred in the EEG, which almost with certainty eliminates a sense of pain.
    B. Sheep
    Similar disturbances… but besides higher frequency there are still clearly superimposed waves (pain). For one animal waves could be recorded after pain stimuli until after the 200th second. Apparent cramps (indication of pain) were registered for ALL SHEEP with the exception of one animal.

    2. Slaughter in the form of RITUAL CUT
    A. Calves
    After the bloodletting cut loss of reaction (loss of consciousness) occurred with high probability within 10 seconds. A clear reaction to the cut could NOT be detected IN ANY ANIMAL. For 7 animals a zero EEG was recorded no later than after 23 seconds. Cramps occurred in the animals regularly only AFTER the brain currents had stopped.
    B. Sheep
    …loss of consciousness occurred after 10 seconds the latest. A clear reaction to the cut could NOT be detected in ANY animal. The zero line (death) was recorded no later than 14 seconds after the cut. Cramps only occurred AFTER the zero line had been detected and were much shorter than after captive bolt stunning.”

    The full study:
    http://www.mustaqim.co.uk/halalstudy.htm

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s