The Curious Relationship Between the CST and the Home Office

An article on the Guardian’s website today provides very important background about why the government acted to ban and subsequently arrest the Palestinian activist Shaykh Raed Salah almost three months ago. I wrote at the time that the Home Office had shown extremely poor judgement in issuing a banning order and that the case against Shaykh Raed looked very weak.

From the Guardian:

The home secretary, Theresa May, was warned by senior officials in the UK Border Agency not to deport a Palestinian activist accused of antisemitism, saying the evidence against him was disputed, open to legal challenge and that the case was “very finely balanced”.

The Home Office presented four allegations of antisemitism against him, all drawn from the Israeli press: that Salah wrote a poem in which he described Jews as “criminal bombers of mosques, slaughterers of pregnant women and babies, robbers and germ in all time”; that he promoted martyrdom; that he invoked a blood libel invocation by saying that “blood had been mixed in the dough of Holy Bread” and that he referenced a fake document, the Protocols of the Elders of Zion, in saying that a third temple would be build on the ruins of the al-Aqsa Mosque in Jerusalem.

His lawyers say the poem was made up and the views expressed in it were abhorrent to their client. A second version of the poem has since been presented but with the admission that a reference to Jews was inserted.

In other alleged quotes, words were interjected to change their meaning, said Salah’s lawyers. In the blood libel accusation, the word Jewish was interjected, when the original referred to the murder of Christian and Muslim children during the Spanish inquisition and a part of the speech in which Salah said defended the right of Jewish worship in synagogues deleted.

On the allegation that he promoted suicide bombing by referring to martyrdom, he had been referring to incidents of Palestinian worshipers being martyred or killed at prayer by the Israeli security forces. The doctored quotes have been repeated by the Israel’s press, pro-Israeli websites, two British newspapers and the CST.

All the above makes it even more disgraceful that the CST is given huge amounts of our taxpayers money by the government. This is an extract from the speech David Cameron gave to the CST earlier this year where he pledged even more money to them.

“Of course, the first line of defence is to protect ourselves against the actions of extremists. That means working ever more intensively with our international partners on tracing plots, on stopping them, on counter-surveillance and intelligence gathering. And it means improving physical security, something CST do so well.

“That costs money. And tonight helps provide some of that money. So I want all of us to dig deep in our pockets and give as much as we can so that CST can continue this essential work. I include the government in that.

“I want to be frank with you. It shames our country that our Jewish schools should need protection. But they do.

“And it’s fantastic that CST provides it. But just as your community does so much to raise money so we should help too.

“So I’m proud that Michael Gove has announced up to £2 million on security for schools this year and there will be more to come for all the years it’s needed in our country.”

What do you think  Cameron has said about the far greater number of attacks on UK mosques and what action do you think he has taken in respect of that?

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Extremism, Government, Zionism and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to The Curious Relationship Between the CST and the Home Office

  1. one says:

    very nice article… worrying situation… the zionest lobby became too powerfull

  2. Asim says:

    Michael Gove is a close friend of the CST. I don’t belittle anti-Semitism but there are some who like to exaggerate it. No one should be surprised to see the Education Secretary furthering that exaggeration.

  3. reb chaim says:

    The CST does not in any way shape or form represent the Jewish community, it is a totally stand alone charity that hides behind over 50 overt & covert cctv cameras in its HQ, Shield House, Harmony Way Hendon. It may supply services to the community but there is a big difference between supplying a service and representing the whole of British Jewry which they claim to do! They clearly do not represent anyone other than their own opinion and the opinion of their secret and anonymous trustees. They have a significant monitoring dept that monitors anti Jewish groups such as neo Nazis & Islamic fundamentalists and this is their excuse for secrecy. I think they over estimate their importance. There are rumours that they may do a little more monitoring than the law allows and if anyone can verity either way please let us know? I understand that the top two salaries are in fact for Mr Richard Benson and Miss Carol Laser and that Mr Gardner is no 3!
    Why a charity has to be so secretive is one question but how the government funds such a secretive charity is a far more serious issue?
    Hate crime reporting is another sore point. Most of UK’s Jewish community do not want to use the CST for hate crime reporting so why have they received a £50,000 pa grant from the home office to run a hate crime reporting phone line when the Jewish community trust police and other than the very orthodox everyone is happy to call police directly. In any event the Very orthodox don’t like the CST and tend to call shomrim if anything but definitely do not call the CST.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s